隐私侵犯Privacy Violations
各式各样的商业模式，正是通过打破人们对数据隐私的种种假设而建立起来的。
Flickr 打破了"你希望照片默认私密"的假设。在 Flickr 出现之前，Shutterfly、Snapfish 等公司所倡导的默认照片分享模式，是私密分享。
LinkedIn 打破了"你的简历是私密的"这一假设。
FourSquare 打破了"你的位置是私密的"这一假设。
Twitter 打破了"你的一部分想法是私密的"这一假设。
Instagr.am 打破了"你手机里的照片是私密的"这一假设。
Blippy 正在试探"你的一部分金融交易是私密的"这一假设。
所有这些服务都在拿你最初对隐私的观念和需求，去交换你对名声与认可的渴望。
下一个会是什么？
All sorts of businesses are being built by violating assumptions about the privacy of data.
Flickr violated the assumption that you wanted your photos private by default. Before Flickr came along, the default photo sharing model, espoused by Shutterfly, Snapfish etc., was that of private photo sharing.
LinkedIn violates the assumption that your resumé is private.
FourSquare violates the assumption that your location is private.
Twitter violates the assumption that some of your thoughts are private.
Instagr.am violates the assumption that your mobile photos are private.
Blippy is testing the assumption that some of your financial transactions are private.
All of these services take your original notion and need for privacy, and trade them off against your need for fame and recognition.
What’s next?